Branding a conscious capital fund

Archival document (2020–21). The brand-narrative work behind the fund, from the early Wise Living Fund framing to the polished True Home narrative. Interesting both as positioning thinking for anyone building in this space, and as a record of how the idea sharpened. Part of the Fund Archive.

The final narrative (True Home, 2021)

True Home — Investing in Conscious Communities

Our ambitionConscious co-living is easy to access and financially, socially and environmentally sustainable. Living like this becomes the preferred choice for the many.
Why we are hereConscious co-living is key to wiser, weller being and a happier, healthier planet. We supply the critical ingredient in making it happen: the physical space — bringing confidence to capital, and capital to conscious communities.
What and howWe acquire and develop spaces for conscious co-living that investors can believe and invest in: raising capital from investors and banks, purchasing land and buildings, leasing long-term to operating partners. The success of the fund and the success of the communities are not separate.
What makes us differentWe are conscious ESG: ethical, patient, long-term, with a not-for-profit management structure. We bridge two worlds — from consciousness to capital: serious mindfulness practitioners and people who've run successful funds and enterprises.
Who we are here forConscious capital: impact investors who want security, impact and values; "conscious" individuals who want something practical to invest in; ESG investors who want deep, true, ethical ESG. And all those dreaming of a more conscious future who want to develop co-living but struggle to organize the capital.
What we valueIntegrity, Inner Growth, Presence with Purpose, Insight & Understanding, Happiness
PersonalityStrong in our beliefs. Rigorous in our assessments. Flexible in our approach. Compassionate in our actions. Patient on our journey.

How we were different (Rufus's positioning notes)

  • vs co-living providers: serious about the community in co-living — and about it being conscious co-living.
  • vs ESG funds: depth of impact and a commitment to ethics and mindfulness (ESG doesn't mention ethics at all!).
  • vs impact investments: the safety of bricks and mortar, plus the ethical/spiritual dimension.
  • vs philanthropy: scale, sustainability, return.
  • vs Radical Routes and similar non-profits: business and fund experience — happy to talk to banks, and having done so.

The pitch, distilled to three reasons to invest: impact (personal, societal, planetary), safety (experienced team, investors own the underlying asset, ethical management), value (not-for-profit, low fees, safe long-term returns).

The earlier framing (Wise Living Fund, 2020)

Our ambitionTo support the growth of flourishing communities better able to address the existential challenges both unique to the 21st century and underlying the human condition itself.
Why we are hereIndividuals and groups increasingly want to live wisely and well, in community. Investors increasingly seek ethical, social, well-governed investments. We exist to bridge the gap.
InspirationThe Edith Maryon Foundation, which permanently removes land and property from speculation and leases it to social initiatives.
Who forThe lonely and disconnected; the seekers of meaning and purpose; those looking to invest for impact.
Values / personalityWisdom. Mindfulness. Wellbeing. / Zen. Compassionate. Philanthropic.

The naming brainstorm

The name went through real work — the shortlist and taglines give a flavour:

  • True Home — Capital for Conscious Coliving / Funding Conscious Communities / Investing in Conscious Communities (truehome.life, truehome.earth…)
  • Conscious Coliving Capital / Conscious Community Capital
  • Wise Living Fund, Mindful Living Fund, Conscious Living, Living Itself
  • Wilder cards: WeFund, Future-Bridge, Wake-Up, Path Finder

The eventual public identity — after the pivot from fund to platform — became Teal Estate, and lives on as the Fund stream.


From the Fund Archive. Condensed from two working documents (Oct 2020 and Jan–Apr 2021).